Why WFM Can’t Live in a Silo Anymore
For years, workforce management has worked like a behind-the-scenes engine. Scheduling, attendance, compliance—all essential, but mostly viewed as operational necessities. For HRIS leaders and ops teams, that meant optimizing tools for accuracy and efficiency, not business outcomes. Until now.
Margins are tighter. Labor is more expensive and harder to retain. And customer expectations aren’t easing up. It’s no longer enough to ask, “Do we have a person scheduled here?” The smarter question is: “Are we staffing in a way that makes this customer interaction profitable?”
That shift, thinking about labor through a cost-to-serve lens, is forcing leaders to look at WFM not just as a toolset, but as a core lever to improve business performance.
What Is “Cost to Serve,” and Why It Matters in WFM
In basic terms, cost to serve (CTS) is what it costs your organization to fulfill customer demand at every touchpoint. It includes labor, inventory, logistics, utilities—anything required to get the job done. In sectors like retail and hospitality, labor is often the biggest and most variable part of that equation.
Here’s the catch: very few HR or operations leaders track staff decisions directly against CTS. Scheduling is usually based on historical patterns or headcount minimums, not dynamic data on where margins actually break down.
But in a high-turnover, margin-sensitive environment, inching even a few percentage points closer to labor-optimized staffing can make a measurable difference in profitability. Especially when rolled out across multiple locations, shifts, and teams.
Common Blind Spots That Hurt Profitability
Making decisions without full visibility leads to well-intentioned mistakes. Here are a few blind spots we see often:
- Static Scheduling Against Dynamic Demand
Many teams still rely on fixed schedules based on store needs or employee availability, even when real-time sales and foot traffic suggest a mismatch. That leads to overstaffing during slow periods, and understaffing when conversion matters most. -
Labor Compliance Workarounds That Add Cost, Not Value
Some managers build in “buffer workers” or leave roles unfilled to cut corners on labor law complexity. These short-term fixes often introduce compliance risks or lead to burnout and missed sales. -
One-Size-Fits-All Store Templates Across Varied Markets
A schedule that works for downtown Toronto probably won’t work in suburban Alberta. Without localization baked into scheduling models, labor efficiencies get lost in translation. -
Lack of Visibility into Labor ROI Per Shift, Per Role
Leaders struggle to answer key questions like, “What’s our average labor cost per transaction on Tuesdays?” or “Which employees generate the most value per hour worked?” That’s not because the data isn’t there—it’s that it’s not being surfaced in ways that matter.
Shifting the Culture: Getting Buy-In to Think Based on CTS
This isn’t just a tech problem, it’s a mindset one. HR and ops leaders need to move from managing people based on hours to managing people based on business impact. Here’s what helps that shift:
-
Talk in Metrics that Finance Cares About
Frame WFM outputs like scheduling accuracy or absenteeism rates in terms of revenue protection, cost reduction, and margin contribution. Data dashboards can help, especially those that tie labor spend to outcomes like sales per labor hour. -
Help Store Managers Think Like Operators, Not Just Schedulers
Managers usually don't get trained to think in cost-to-serve terms. If your technology can show them the impact of two versions of a schedule on labor efficiency or customer throughput, that’s huge. It turns scheduling into an active lever, not admin. -
Use Configurable Rule Engines, Not Just Rigid Shift Templates
Markets shift. Labor laws change. Templates break. WorkAxle’s approach uses adaptable rules to build schedules that flex with demand and stay compliant. That means you get tailored schedules without manual labor—and costs stay in check.
What a CTS-Driven WFM System Looks Like
The good news? You don’t have to blow up your WFM program to get here. But upgrades matter. A system designed around cost-to-serve principles will include:
-
Real-Time Demand Forecasting
Live sales data. Foot traffic. Weather. A modern WFM platform should let you schedule based on what’s happening, not just what’s happened. -
Labor Efficiency Insights by Role and Location
Know your labor cost per transaction, per role, per shift. Not weekly averages. This makes it easier to replicate high-performance models. -
Intelligent Compliance Guardrails
Compliance issues drive cost. Rule-based scheduling engines (like WorkAxle’s) adapt to local laws automatically, so you stay protected without tying up your legal team. -
Configuration by Design
WorkAxle allows you to configure almost everything from labor rules and shift patterns to alert thresholds, without drowning in spreadsheets or IT requests.
Bottom Line: Better Labor Strategy = Better Business Results
When workforce management is done well, it drives profitability. That’s why cost-to-serve thinking should be baked into your WFM strategy from day one.
Every shift, every store, every role contributes to your bottom line. The question is, do you have the insights and tools to see how?
