Predictive scheduling laws in 2026: full U.S. map.

Eleven jurisdictions require advance written notice of a schedule and pay for a late employer-made change: Oregon statewide, plus ten cities and counties. Fourteen days and one hour of pay is the common pattern — San Francisco, New York City and Philadelphia each price it differently.

WX
WorkAxle
Compliance research
Not legal advice. This post summarizes publicly available information about predictive scheduling ordinances, current as of September 2026. Requirements change and vary by jurisdiction. Consult qualified legal counsel before making compliance decisions for your organization.
TL;DR

Eleven jurisdictions require advance written notice of a work schedule and pay when an employer changes it late: Oregon statewide, plus ten cities and counties across California, Washington, New York, Illinois and Pennsylvania. Fourteen days' notice and one hour of pay is the common default. San Francisco's premium triggers at seven days rather than 14, New York City retail runs on 72 hours, and Philadelphia prices a short rest at a flat $40 inside a nine-hour window.

Published counts of predictive scheduling jurisdictions run from about nine to twenty-one, and the gap is rarely explained. Broader lists fold in reporting-time pay and access-to-hours rules, which are real obligations but not schedule-notice mandates[2]. On the narrower test used here — advance written notice of the schedule, plus pay for an employer-initiated late change — the answer is eleven.

Which jurisdictions require predictive scheduling, by state?

Predictive scheduling laws (also called fair workweek or secure scheduling laws) require covered employers to post a work schedule a set number of days in advance and to pay a premium when they change it on short notice. A jurisdiction counts here if it meets both halves of that test[1].

That test yields eleven, spanning six states: California (San Francisco, Emeryville, Los Angeles City, Berkeley, Los Angeles County), Washington (Seattle), New York (New York City), Oregon (statewide), Illinois (Chicago, Evanston) and Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).

JurisdictionAdvance noticeA late change costsShort rest
San Francisco, CA2 weeks posted, pay triggers at 7 days1 to 4 hours by shift lengthNot applicable
Emeryville, CA2 weeks1 hour, or 4 hours capped at the shift11 hours, time and a half
Seattle, WA14 days1 hour, or half the hours lost10 hours, time and a half
New York City, NY14 days fast food, 72 hours retailFast food: $10–$75 by notice window. Retail: no per-change premium — changes are restricted insteadClopening premium, amount not published
Oregon (statewide)14 days, was 7 until 20201 hour, or half rate per hour lost10 hours, time and a half
Philadelphia, PA14 days, was 10 until 20211 hour, or half rate per hour lost9 hours, flat $40
Chicago, IL14 days1 hour, or 50% if cancelled inside 24 hours10 hours, 1.25x
Los Angeles City, CA14 days1 hour, or half rate per hour lost10 hours, time and a half
Evanston, IL14 days1 hour, or 4 hours capped at the shift11 hours, time and a half
Berkeley, CA14 days1 hour, or 4 hours capped at the hours reduced11 hours, time and a half
Los Angeles County, CA14 days1 hour, or half rate per hour lost10 hours, time and a half

Where a figure reads Not published, the jurisdiction does not state it in its own materials. It is not an estimate and it is not zero — each jurisdiction entry below names the agency to ask directly.

The eleven jurisdictions, oldest law first

San Francisco, California

In force
3 Jul 2015
Who is covered
Formula retail establishments, plus their janitorial and security contractors. 40 or more stores worldwide and 20 or more employees in San Francisco
Advance notice
2 weeks posted. The pay obligation is triggered at 7 days, not 14
A late change costs
At the regular hourly rate, on less than 7 days but 24 hours or more notice: 1 hour. On less than 24 hours: 2 hours for a shift of 4 hours or less, 4 hours for a shift longer than 4 hours[4]
Short rest
Not applicable — the ordinance we read has no right-to-rest or short-rest provision[4]
Enforcement
SF Office of Labor Standards Enforcement[3]
Statute
Formula Retail Employee Rights Ordinances, Ord. 241-14 (Fair Scheduling and Treatment); SF Police Code Art. 33G[3][4]

Emeryville, California

In force
1 Jul 2017
Who is covered
Retail and fast food firms, franchisees included. Retail 56 or more worldwide; fast food 56 or more worldwide and 20 or more in Emeryville
Advance notice
2 weeks, issued as a biweekly schedule
A late change costs
Less than 14 days but 24 hours or more notice: 1 hour. Less than 24 hours: for hours cancelled or reduced, 4 hours or the hours in the scheduled shift, whichever is less; for any other change, 1 hour[12]
Short rest
11 hours. The employee may decline; if they agree in writing, hours worked inside the window pay one and a half times the regular rate[12]
Enforcement
City of Emeryville[11]
Statute
Fair Workweek Employment Standards, Emeryville Mun. Code Tit. 5 ch. 39[11][12]

Seattle, Washington

In force
1 Jul 2017
Who is covered
Retail and food service. 500 or more employees worldwide; full-service restaurants also 40 or more locations worldwide
Advance notice
14 days
A late change costs
Priced off the scheduled rate. Added hours or a start/end/date change with no loss of hours: 1 hour. Hours subtracted, or on-call hours where the employee is not called in: half the hours not worked[9]
Short rest
Shifts separated by less than 10 hours: time and a half, owed regardless of request or consent[9]
Enforcement
Seattle Office of Labor Standards[8]
Statute
Secure Scheduling Ordinance, SMC ch. 14.22[8][9]

New York City, New York

In force
2017
Who is covered
Two tracks. Fast food: 30 or more locations nationwide. Retail: 20 or more employees in New York City
Advance notice
14 days for fast food; 72 hours for retail. Retail employers also cannot schedule on-call shifts or require work on less than 72 hours' notice[5]
A late change costs
Fast food is a flat dollar scale, not a multiplier of pay: a change with less than 14 days' notice costs $10 per change for added or shifted hours and $20 for reduced hours; inside 7 days those rise to $15 and $45; inside 24 hours, $15 and $75[6]. Retail carries no per-change dollar premium. Instead the law restricts the change itself: no on-call shifts, no cancelling inside 72 hours, no requiring work inside 72 hours without the employee's consent[5]
Short rest
Clopening premium owed; amount not published in a source we could read[7]
Enforcement
NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection[5]
Statute
Fair Workweek Law[5][6][7]

The two tracks carry different notice periods, so a single figure for New York City does not hold for both.

Oregon

In force
1 Jul 2018
Who is covered
Retail trade, hotels and motels, food services. 500 or more employees worldwide
Advance notice
14 calendar days. It was 7 days until 1 Jul 2020[14]
A late change costs
1 hour at the regular rate for an employer addition. Half the regular rate per scheduled hour not worked where hours are subtracted or lost[13]
Short rest
No work may be scheduled in the first 10 hours after the previous shift; worked anyway, it pays time and a half[13]
Enforcement
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries[13]
Statute
Fair Work Week Act, SB 828 (2017), ORS 653.412 to 653.490[13][14]

The only statewide law.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

In force
1 Apr 2020
Who is covered
Retail, hospitality, food services. 250 or more employees and 30 or more locations worldwide, franchise networks counted in aggregate
Advance notice
14 days. It was 10 days until 31 Dec 2020[15]
A late change costs
1 hour at the regular rate where time is added or the date, time or location changes with no loss of hours. No less than half the regular rate per hour for hours subtracted or a shift cancelled[15]
Short rest
9 hours — the shortest window on this page — and the premium is a flat $40 per shift rather than a multiplier[15]
Enforcement
Office of Worker Protections, Philadelphia Department of Labor[17]
Statute
Fair Workweek Employment Standards, Philadelphia Code ch. 9-4600[15][16][17]

Chicago, Illinois

In force
1 Jul 2020
Who is covered
Seven industries, including building services, healthcare, hotels, manufacturing, restaurants, retail and warehouse services. 100 or more employees globally; restaurants 250 or more employees and 30 or more locations. Wage line re-indexes annually[18]
Advance notice
14 calendar days
A late change costs
1 hour where hours are added or a shift's time or date changes with no change in hours. Hours or a shift cancelled with less than 24 hours' notice: no less than 50% of the pay for those hours[19]
Short rest
An employee may decline a shift starting less than 10 hours after the previous shift; worked, it pays 1.25 times the base rate, owed since 1 Jun 2026 even where the employee consented[19][20]
Enforcement
Chicago Office of Labor Standards[18]
Statute
Fair Workweek Ordinance, MCC ch. 6-110; rules amended effective 1 Jun 2026[18][19][20]

Rules amended effective 1 June 2026: on-call shifts must sit in the posted schedule, the voluntary-change exception now requires the request in writing, and the rest premium is owed even with consent. No headline rate changed.

Los Angeles, California (city)

In force
1 Apr 2023
Who is covered
Retail. 300 or more employees globally
Advance notice
14 days, written
A late change costs
1 hour at the regular rate for an increase of more than 15 minutes or a date, time or location change. Half the regular rate per hour for a reduction of at least 15 minutes, or for an on-call shift the employer never calls in[21]
Short rest
10 hours between shifts; a "clopening" needs the employee's written consent, and worked, it pays time and a half[21]
Enforcement
Los Angeles Office of Wage Standards[21]
Statute
Fair Work Week Ordinance[21]

Evanston, Illinois

In force
1 Jan 2024
Who is covered
Six industries: hospitality; food service and restaurants; retail; warehouse services; manufacturing; building services. 100 or more employees, plus franchisees under 100 employees tied to a network of more than 30 locations globally[24]
Advance notice
14 days before the first scheduled shift
A late change costs
Less than 14 days but 24 hours or more notice: 1 hour. Less than 24 hours: for hours cancelled or reduced, 4 hours or the hours in the scheduled shift, whichever is less; for any other change, 1 hour[24]
Short rest
11 hours; hours worked inside the window pay one and a half times the regular rate[24]
Enforcement
City of Evanston. Fines $300 to $500 per violation[23][24]
Statute
Fair Workweek Ordinance, Ord. No. 24-O-23, Evanston City Code Tit. 3 ch. 34[23][24]

The introduced draft set the threshold at 15 employees across nine industries. The enacted code sets 100 across six, and some published summaries still report the draft figure.

Berkeley, California

In force
12 Jan 2024
Who is covered
Building services, healthcare, hotel, manufacturing, retail, warehouse services; restaurants; franchisees; not-for-profits. 10 or more employees in Berkeley, plus a global-size test that varies by industry[25]
Advance notice
14 days, plus a good-faith estimate of minimum hours by the first day of work
A late change costs
Less than 14 days but at least 24 hours' notice: 1 hour. Cancelling a shift or reducing hours on less than 24 hours' notice: 4 hours or the hours reduced, whichever is less. Adding hours or moving a shift on less than 24 hours: 1 hour[25]
Short rest
11 hours; every hour worked inside the window pays time and a half[25]
Enforcement
City of Berkeley[25]
Statute
Fair Workweek Employment Standards, Ord. No. 7,846-N.S., BMC ch. 13.102[25][26]

Los Angeles County, California (unincorporated)

In force
1 Jul 2025
Who is covered
Retail. 300 or more employees globally, in unincorporated areas of the county
Advance notice
14 days[27]
A late change costs
1 hour at the regular rate for a change that adds hours or does not reduce them. Half the regular rate for scheduled or on-call hours the employee does not end up working[28]
Short rest
10 hours between shifts; with the employee's written consent, working inside that window pays time and a half — the same structure the City of Los Angeles uses[27][28]
Enforcement
Los Angeles County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs[27]
Statute
Fair Workweek Ordinance[27][28]

A store inside the City of Los Angeles follows the City ordinance; one in unincorporated county territory follows the County's. Geography decides, not employer size. On the figures each publishes, the two ordinances price a late change and a short rest the same way.

When did each law actually take effect?

A law has more than one date: the date it was adopted, the date it became effective, and the date its duties became operative. Those can sit a year or more apart. Berkeley is the clearest recent case — adopted 13 December 2022, effective 12 January 2023, but its duties did not begin until 12 January 2024[25].

JurisdictionAdoptedEffectiveOperative (duties began)
San Francisco, CA5 Dec 20144 Jan 20153 Jul 2015
New York City, NYNot publishedNot published2017
Seattle, WANot publishedNot published1 Jul 2017
Emeryville, CA1 Nov 20161 Jul 20171 Jul 2017
Oregon (statewide)8 Aug 20178 Aug 20171 Jul 2018
Philadelphia, PA20 Dec 2018Not published1 Apr 2020
Chicago, ILNot publishedNot published1 Jul 2020
Los Angeles City, CANot publishedNot published1 Apr 2023
Evanston, IL22 May 20231 Sept 20231 Jan 2024
Berkeley, CA13 Dec 202212 Jan 202312 Jan 2024
Los Angeles County, CANot publishedNot published1 Jul 2025

Oregon ran on seven days for its first two years in force before the same 2017 Act moved it to 14 days on 1 July 2020[14]. Philadelphia did the same on a shorter runway, 10 days to 14 on 1 January 2021. Anyone reconstructing a 2019 schedule or payroll needs the number that applied on that date, not today's.

How much is predictability pay?

The most common rate is one hour of pay at the regular rate for an employer-initiated change that does not cut a worker's hours, and half the regular rate for hours the worker was scheduled for and did not get to work. That baseline holds in Oregon, Philadelphia, Seattle, Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, and, for hours added, Chicago, Berkeley, Emeryville and Evanston, and it is owed per shift, not per pay period.

Four jurisdictions price it differently, and that is where the money sits:

  • San Francisco scales by shift length. Inside 24 hours it is two hours of pay for a shift of four hours or less and four hours for anything longer, and the trigger is seven days rather than 14.
  • Berkeley, Emeryville and Evanston cap a late cancellation. Four hours of pay or the hours in the scheduled shift, whichever is less — on a three-hour shift, that is three hours, not four.
  • Chicago prices a late cancellation as a percentage. No less than 50% of the pay for the cancelled hours.
  • Philadelphia's short-rest premium is a flat $40 per shift rather than a multiplier, inside its nine-hour window — the shortest rest window on this list.

In several jurisdictions the premium is owed even when the employee wanted the change. Seattle's rest premium is due regardless of request or consent, and Chicago's 2026 rules made the same point explicit for its 1.25 times premium[9][20]. Chicago allows a genuine employee-initiated exception, but only if the request is in writing since 1 June 2026 — the change most likely to catch out a manager who treated a verbal swap as settled.

Which laws get folded into predictive scheduling counts but aren't?

Two families of law get folded into broader counts. Both are real obligations, and neither is an advance-notice mandate[2]. Reporting-time or show-up pay laws, active in states including California, Massachusetts and New York, require paying a worker who shows up and is sent home — but say nothing about posting a schedule in advance. Access-to-hours laws, such as San Jose's Opportunity to Work Ordinance, require offering available hours to existing part-time staff before hiring outside, with no advance-schedule requirement. New York State, as distinct from New York City, has no predictive scheduling law under either test.

Which states prohibit cities from passing these laws?

Eleven states are commonly listed as preempting local predictive scheduling ordinances. On direct review of the statutory text, six can be confirmed: Kansas, Michigan, Iowa, Wisconsin, Florida and Oregon each use the word "scheduling" in their own preemption statute[33][34][35][36][37].

Ohio and Georgia probably belong on this list — both are widely reported to preempt scheduling, at ORC § 4113.85 and O.C.G.A. § 34-4-3.1 — but neither state's code site would load for verification, so neither has been read directly. Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana and Tennessee are often listed alongside the other seven, and their statutes could not be confirmed to name scheduling at all. Six confirmed, five not independently confirmed against primary text.

One fact rarely appears in these lists: Oregon is on both lists. It barred its own cities from regulating work schedules in 2015, two years before it became the first state to impose a statewide predictive scheduling law, and the same 2017 Act that created that duty made the local preemption permanent[14].

What does a multi-jurisdiction employer do with this?

A rule with three dates — adopted, effective, operative — has to be stored with those dates attached, not collapsed into one current value. Oregon's notice period genuinely was seven days on 30 June 2020 and 14 days on 1 July 2020. A system holding one number per jurisdiction cannot answer a 2019 audit question correctly, and it cannot stage a known future change without someone remembering to flip it by hand on the right morning.

Jurisdiction is a property of the location, not of the company. A retailer with stores inside the City of Los Angeles and in unincorporated county pockets nearby is running two different rule sets on the same Saturday. So WorkAxle's rule engine attaches each site to its own rule pack and, when a proposed change would trip a premium, names the rule and shows the cost while the scheduler is still deciding — rather than surfacing it on the next payroll run.

  • Audit jurisdiction exposure first. Map every location against the eleven jurisdictions above. Most employers find fewer sites in scope than they feared, since every one of these laws carries an industry and headcount threshold.
  • Store the dates, not just the current rule. Notice periods and premium amounts have moved before (Oregon, Philadelphia) and will move again as jurisdictions amend rules, as Chicago did in 2026.
  • Treat the six confirmed preemption states differently from the five unconfirmed ones. A compliance plan built on an unverified list is a plan built on a guess.
Jurisdiction facts first researched against government sources 5 August 2026. A full independent fact-check against the primary government sources was completed 1 September 2026: every listed URL was live, the Oregon statute citation was corrected (ORS 653.412 to 653.490, not .485), and the New York City fast-food premium table, the Los Angeles City predictability-pay schedule, and the Los Angeles County predictability-pay figure were added after being marked "not published" in error — each was already stated in a source this page cites. Chicago's covered-employee wage line and Philadelphia's tipped-worker rate both re-index annually — verify those two against the agency before relying on them. See Sources below for what could and could not be independently confirmed.

Frequently asked.

Which states have predictive scheduling laws in 2026?

Oregon is the only state with a statewide predictive scheduling law. Its Fair Work Week Act, ORS 653.412 to 653.490, has been operative since 1 July 2018 and covers retail, hotel, motel and food service employers with 500 or more employees worldwide.

The other ten jurisdictions are cities and counties: San Francisco, New York City, Seattle, Emeryville, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles City, Evanston, Berkeley and unincorporated Los Angeles County. That is 11 jurisdictions in total, on the test that the law must require advance written notice of the schedule and pay the worker for an employer-initiated late change.

How much is predictability pay?

In most covered jurisdictions, a late change that does not cut hours costs one hour of pay at the regular rate, and hours the worker loses are paid at half the regular rate.

Four price it differently. San Francisco owes two hours for a shift of four hours or less and four hours for a longer one when notice is under 24 hours. Berkeley, Emeryville and Evanston cap a late cancellation at four hours of pay or the hours in the scheduled shift, whichever is less. Chicago owes no less than 50% of the pay for hours cancelled inside 24 hours. Short-rest premiums run at time and a half in most places, 1.25 times in Chicago, and a flat $40 per shift in Philadelphia.

Does New York have a predictive scheduling law?

New York City does. New York State does not.

The city's Fair Workweek Law has been in force since 2017 and runs on two tracks with different rules. Fast food employers with 30 or more locations nationwide owe 14 days of advance notice. Retail employers with 20 or more employees in the city owe 72 hours. A single 14-day figure for New York City does not hold for retail. Enforcement is by the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection.

How much advance notice does a predictive scheduling law require?

Fourteen days is the most common requirement, but it is neither universal nor stable over time. New York City retail is 72 hours. San Francisco requires a schedule two weeks out but its pay obligation triggers at seven days.

And the number has moved. Oregon's notice period was seven days from 1 July 2018 and became 14 only on 1 July 2020. Philadelphia's was 10 days from 1 April 2020 and became 14 on 1 January 2021. If you are reconstructing a past schedule or payroll, use the number that applied on that date, not today's.

Why do different sources give a different number of predictive scheduling jurisdictions?

Because they use different inclusion tests and rarely state them. Published counts range from about nine to 21.

Broader lists fold in reporting-time or show-up pay rules, active in states including California, Massachusetts and New York, which pay a worker who reports and is sent home but require no advance notice. They also fold in access-to-hours laws such as San Jose's Opportunity to Work Ordinance, which require offering hours to existing part-timers but impose no advance schedule. On the narrower test of advance written notice plus pay for an employer-initiated late change, the answer is 11 jurisdictions.

Which states prohibit cities from passing predictive scheduling laws?

Six can be confirmed from their own statutory text, where the statute itself uses the word scheduling: Kansas, Michigan, Iowa, Wisconsin, Florida and Oregon. Florida's scheduling preemption arrived in 2024 through HB 433 and took effect 1 July 2024. Oregon appears on both lists, since it barred its own cities from regulating work schedules in 2015, two years before becoming the first state to impose a statewide law.

Ohio and Georgia are widely reported to have scheduling preemption, at ORC 4113.85 and O.C.G.A. 34-4-3.1, but their state code sites could not be reached to confirm the text directly. Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana and Tennessee are often listed and their statutes could not be confirmed to name scheduling at all.

Sources

Jurisdiction research was conducted against the government sources below on 5 August 2026. Every URL listed was re-checked live on 1 September 2026 with no dead links found; entries marked "reconfirmed" were also independently re-read in full on that date. The rest were not re-read this cycle — treat the 5 August date as the last full read.

  1. HR Dive. A running list of states and localities with predictive scheduling mandates. hrdive.com. Accessed 5 August 2026. Trade press. Cited for its enumeration of jurisdictions, checked against each government source below.
  2. A Better Balance. Fact sheet: state and city laws and regulations on fair and flexible scheduling. abetterbalance.org. Accessed 5 August 2026. Legal advocacy organization. Cited for the broader inclusion test and the reporting-time and access-to-hours laws it counts, which we exclude.
  3. City and County of San Francisco. Formula Retail Employee Rights Ordinance. sf.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026.
  4. San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Ordinance No. 241-14, Fair Scheduling and Treatment of Formula Retail Employees (PDF), File No. 141024. SF Police Code Art. 33G. sfbos.archive.sf.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  5. New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. Fair Workweek Law: Information for Retail Employers. nyc.gov. Accessed and independently re-read 1 September 2026. This DCWP page states the 72-hour retail notice requirement directly.
  6. New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. Fair Workweek FAQs for fast food employers and employees (PDF). nyc.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live and independently re-read 1 September 2026. Source of the fast-food Schedule Change Premium Amounts table ($10–$75 by notice window).
  7. New York City Rules. Fair Workweek Law for Fast Food Workers. rules.cityofnewyork.us. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  8. City of Seattle Office of Labor Standards. Secure Scheduling Ordinance. SMC ch. 14.22. seattle.gov. Accessed and independently re-read 1 September 2026.
  9. City of Seattle Office of Labor Standards. Secure Scheduling questions and answers (PDF), including the compensation table. seattle.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026. The document states it was last updated March 2023.
  10. City of Emeryville. Fair Workweek Ordinance. Emeryville Mun. Code Tit. 5 ch. 39. emeryville.org. Accessed 5 August 2026. The city's page blocks automated access (confirmed again 1 September 2026), so this is cited for the ordinance's existence and administration only.
  11. City of Emeryville. Fair Workweek Ordinance, adopted text, Legistar File ID-2016-651. emeryville.legistar.com. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  12. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. Predictive scheduling. ORS 653.412 to 653.490. oregon.gov. Accessed and independently re-read 1 September 2026.
  13. Oregon Legislative Assembly. Oregon Laws 2017, chapter 691 (SB 828) (PDF). oregonlegislature.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  14. City of Philadelphia. Fair Workweek Employment Standards (PDF), Bill No. 180649-A. Philadelphia Code ch. 9-4600. phila.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  15. City of Philadelphia. Fair Workweek Employment Standards regulations (PDF). phila.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  16. City of Philadelphia. Fair Workweek FAQ (PDF). phila.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  17. City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection. Fair Workweek Ordinance. MCC ch. 6-110. chicago.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  18. City of Chicago. Fair Workweek Ordinance FAQ (PDF). chicago.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  19. City of Chicago. Summary of changes, 2026 Fair Workweek Rules updates (PDF), May 2026, effective 1 June 2026. chicago.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  20. City of Los Angeles Office of Wage Standards. Fair Work Week. wagesla.lacity.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live and independently re-read 1 September 2026. Source of the Predictability Pay Schedule table (1 hour / half rate) and the clopening consent-and-time-and-a-half rule.
  21. City of Evanston. Fair Workweek. cityofevanston.org. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  22. Municode. Evanston City Code Title 3 ch. 34, Fair Workweek Ordinance, Ord. No. 24-O-23. library.municode.com. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  23. City of Berkeley. Fair Workweek FAQ (PDF), rev. 23 August 2024. BMC ch. 13.102. berkeleyca.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live 1 September 2026.
  24. City of Berkeley. Ordinance No. 7,846-N.S. (PDF), adopted 13 December 2022. berkeleyca.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026.
  25. Los Angeles County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs. Fair Workweek Ordinance. dcba.lacounty.gov. Accessed and independently re-read 1 September 2026.
  26. Los Angeles County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs. Fair Workweek Ordinance FAQs (PDF), 25 June 2025. dcba.lacounty.gov. Accessed 5 August 2026; link reconfirmed live and independently re-read 1 September 2026. Source of the Predictability Pay figure (1 hour / half rate) and the 10-hour rest premium at time and a half.
  27. Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes. K.S.A. § 12-16,130. Statutory text read 5 August 2026. Read on the state's own statute site. No permanent deep link recorded; not independently re-read 1 September 2026.
  28. Michigan Legislature. MCL § 123.1389, Act 105 of 2015. Statutory text read 5 August 2026. Read on the state's own legislature site. No permanent deep link recorded; not independently re-read 1 September 2026. Note that MCL § 123.1384, which circulates with this list, is a different subject.
  29. Iowa Legislature. Iowa Code § 364.3(12)(a), as amended by HF 295 (2017). Statutory text read 5 August 2026. Read on the state's own legislature site. No permanent deep link recorded; not independently re-read 1 September 2026.
  30. Wisconsin State Legislature. Wis. Stat. § 103.007, 2017 Act 327. Statutory text read 5 August 2026. Read on the state's own statute site. No permanent deep link recorded; not independently re-read 1 September 2026.
  31. Florida Senate. HB 433 (2024), ch. 2024-80, Laws of Florida, bill analysis and enrolled text. Read 5 August 2026. Read on the Florida Senate's own site. No permanent deep link recorded; not independently re-read 1 September 2026. Florida § 218.077, which circulates as this state's scheduling preemption, covers minimum wage and employment benefits and contains no scheduling language.
WX
WorkAxle Compliance research

WorkAxle builds workforce management software for organisations running multi-jurisdiction, multi-union workforces. Every figure in this guide was read from the government source listed above on the date shown. These requirements change, and several of the figures re-index annually, so verify against the issuing agency before relying on them.

More from this author

Get workforce management insights delivered.

One post every two weeks. Long-form analysis from the team that runs the platform. Written for operators, not for the marketing pipeline.

The Compliance Rule Engine page.

See how WorkAxle holds an effective date on every rule, so a jurisdiction's notice period can change on a set morning without anyone remembering to flip it.

Run the WFM Readiness Diagnostic.

Eight questions, one number. A read on whether your current scheduling stack handles multi-jurisdiction compliance or leaves it to chance.

See the rules applied to your own locations.

Bring your site list. We will walk through which of these 11 jurisdictions each location falls under and what a late change costs in each.